“All of that buzzing, of advertising and consumerism and globalization, it all just kind of stopped.”
These are Mark McDowell’s initial impressions on his first visit to Myanmar back in 2001, in advance of the massive changes the country would see in ensuring years. McDowell, a foreign service officer who spent decades working across Southeast Asia, was posted as Canada’s first-ever ambassador in Yangon from 2013 to 2016.
Going into more detail about that first trip, he recalls it as an encounter that felt both unmistakably political and oddly intimate at the level of daily life, a place where calm could coexist with coercion, and where the texture of ordinary Burmese existence could be impossible to separate from the machinery of a military state.
Posted to Bangkok in 2003 as political counsellor, McDowell became the main Canadian official making regular trips into Myanmar, building contacts with activists, civil society groups, and the small ecosystem of international missions already present. He places that period inside a Canadian policy environment he found unusually indirect. Myanmar policy, in practice, was often shaped by Canada-based advocacy and border-focused organizations whose access and institutional habits sat largely outside the country. He argues that this produced a set of incentives that rewarded moral clarity in Ottawa while leaving little room for the slower work of building durable relationships inside Myanmar, where reality rarely aligned cleanly with the narratives that travelled well abroad.
In this period of the mid-2000s, newly released political prisoners and opposition figures were available for contact and support. Small programs—training, quiet networking, low-cost capacity-building—created points of connection, and he describes the work as “pioneering” mainly because so little had been attempted from the Canadian side before. Yet he also emphasizes how fragile this engagement was, not simply because Myanmar was dangerous or closed, but because Canadian bureaucracy could be just as constraining in its own way. Approvals were slow, internal caution was high, and the political appetite to invest in sustained in-country work could evaporate quickly, leaving local partners exposed to the consequences of international attention without the protection of sustained international commitment.
Cyclone Nargis and its aftermath become another hinge. In the months following the disaster, McDowell became persuaded that the surge of humanitarian funding helped catalyze a more capable civil society—local organizations that formed around relief work, people trained through emergency programs, networks built under pressure that later evolved into broader forms of social action. While not seeing this exactly as an origin story for Myanmar’s later reform period, McDowell does believe this was an important period when political space began to open.
CATCH THE PODCAST
Read more and listen to the Insight Myanmar Podcast here:
Comments
Post a Comment